2 Months of intense cricket in Australia has come to and end and we get a chance to have a breather whilst the players freshen up for round 2.
At the beginning of the tour I had expectations and hopes for a test and ODI series victory but I expected it to be closer than it ended up finishing. Although we won comprehensively, we did not dominate. The decisive factor being that we won more of the important moments when they counted.
Whilst we can be extremely happy with a tour victory, I hope we don’t rest on our laurels as there are still many areas we can improve on.
The test side shows a lot of confidence and has established a great winning culture. Whilst we hunted down our targets and batted sensibly, my concerns are that we never posted a really big score (although we might’ve in the second innings in Perth). In all 3 tests, a first innings of 500+ would have really set us up well. That was highlighted by the lack of centuries all tour. Apart from the second innings in Perth, and JP Duminy in Melbourne, no one else got a hundred. But no one batted badly except for McKenzie.
Smith, Amla, Kallis, De Villiers and Boucher did their jobs but not more than that. The opportunity was there for one of them to really cash in, lift their averages and set their team up. Considering that since readmission our top batters have all average in the 30’s against Australia, it was pleasing that as a group, our top 6 lifted their game and their averages towards a more respectable 40+. However it only takes 2 centuries per innings to build a total you are unlikely to lose from and really bury the opposition. In the return series I have a feeling we will need a few more centuries.
However in saying that Australia only had the 1 century from Ponting. They have built their game around large first innings totals, so getting them out for scores that were not beatable, played a huge role in keeping us in the game and being able to take victory.
The other aspect that was particularly noticeable, and maybe it was the reason why Australia scored less than us per innings in the end, was the fact we scored at about 3 an over (Smith was the exception but has to score quickly to make up for McKenzie!), whereas they scored about 4 an over. Our batters all displayed top class temperament which is vital for test cricket. The ability to play each ball on its merit, to play and miss and then simply forget about it and start again. Duminy was a great example of this in Melbourne. However the downside was that again we possibly weren’t attacking enough when we needed to be. I’d like to see us show a bit more confidence, take the game to the aussies and really put them away.
It was particularly pleasing to see our tail take more responsibility and show a bit more grit and determination. It has been a weakness for us, and Harris was good, and Steyn in Melbourne was getting hammered with shorts balls around his fingers. His determination and courage won us that game, and allowed Duminy to shine.
Our bowlers got the job done also but again need to go into overdrive. Steyn again got results like he did all though 2008. I thought Morkel was very disappointing, didn’t get much wickets, lacked control and was expensive.
Ntini battled away as he always does, and got vital wickets but perhaps won’t get 5 wicket bag like he used to. And although it surprised Australia, Harris was damn good. He used great control, and it shows that if you bowl tight and stop runs, you will get rewarded with wickets.
All in all our bowling lacked consistency. Steyn bowled some magnificent deliveries but mixed with that were too many deliveries wide of off stump that the batsmen did not have to play. I also felt there were too many short of a length deliveries that the batsmen could hit with little risk.
I would like to see us attack the stumps more often. We have bowlers who all bowl great yorkers, (Steyn can be almost unplayable). Attacking the stumps also increases your chances of getting the batter out a you bring in more modes of dismissal. Bowled, LBW, caught behind…
If there is an area we are weak, and we struggled last time we toured Australia, it is bowling the tail out. We often had Australia in trouble eg Perth and 3/15 on the opening morning but simply couldn’t wrap up the innings cheaply. I think our strategy needs to change, especially with our weapon Steyn. Attacking the stumps and setting fields which back up straight bowling in my view will bring about the desired results.
The wickets for the South African series are all result wickets. Newlands may be high scoring, but Durban and Joburg will all favour the bowlers but allow centuries if you are prepared to graft and apply yourself. I am hoping for a comprehensive test series victory if we can dominate with bat and ball.
The ODI series was quite different, albeit a similar result. Again we did not dominate with all contests bar Adelaide being reasonably well contested. However like the test series we again won the key moments.
Without Smith we struggled initially. I felt the players took time to get used to Botha’s captaincy, and lacked urgency initially.
We definitely got better as the series progressed, and the pleasing aspect (I hope it is permanent) is that we learnt how to construct our innings. Since readmission I’ve felt that we are too conservative in the one day game and try not to lose, rather than aiming to win. We prefer chasing, and if that is the case I like to see us come out and start well so that the run rate doesn’t climb too high. Otherwise we end up putting too much pressure on the middle and lower order. Too often in the past our strategy has been to keep wickets in hand for the end. If the run rate gets too high like it did in Hobart, it doesn’t matter how many wickets you have left. Sometimes you just can’t get them, whilst other times you lose wickets from the pressure. It requires a near perfect execution to get there. Whereas gaining momentum from the beginning makes the job so much easier. The Adelaide run chase was a perfect example of how to make it look easy.
On the bowling side of things, I thought we did a great job, other than the first 10 overs. By the end of the series we were at least taking wickets which kills the oppositions chances of a huge total. But allowing them to score at 5-6 an over puts the pressure right back on you. Something for us to work on.
The way we fought back in the middle overs was magnificent. Couldn’t ask for more. And our bowling at the death was good. Interestingly we used the yorkers and fuller delivers to great effect. Something Australia wasn’t able to do. Maybe we could use the short ball/bouncer a bit more as a surprise delivery. That was one thing Australia did to us, and our batters especially Duminy and Amla weren’t prepared to go after them. We also have more of our bowlers bowling cutters and slower deliveries which is great. We will need them on the subcontinent and for the next world cup.
The only change I’d like to see would be to get rid of Gibbs. He’s too old, too inconsistent and doesn’t add enough value contributions. Surely we can develop someone else, the way we have with Amla and Duminy.
The 20/20’s were perhaps a disappointment. Maybe we were readjusting after the test series, with a new captain. Tactically we were naïve. In the second one we looked like we were playing a test match. But I’ll reserve judgement until the South African edition as I feel we were on the right track after the one dayers.